<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ai on Jelmer de Jong</title>
    <link>https://jelmerdejong.com/tags/ai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ai on Jelmer de Jong</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:14:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://jelmerdejong.com/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Building an AI-native firm in 30 days. Except we didn’t.</title>
      <link>https://jelmerdejong.com/posts/building-an-ai-native-firm-in-30-days-except-we-didnt/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:14:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jelmerdejong.com/posts/building-an-ai-native-firm-in-30-days-except-we-didnt/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;“Building an AI-native firm in 30 days” is a great LinkedIn AI slop bait title.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are not AI-native. We are roughly 10x more AI-enabled than we were on April 1st. Those are different sentences. The gap between them, between &lt;em&gt;AI-enabled&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;AI-native&lt;/em&gt;, is most of what I want to share, because it is the thing every VC, CTO, and partnership-led firm I now talk to is getting wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For 30 days in April, I ran a sprint that pulled our entire firm (partners, investors, finance, legal, EAs, ops, all 30 of us) out of business-as-usual. The one thing we did not drop was answering our founders. We are a venture firm, and that line is sacred. Everything else moved aside, so that between 50 and 80% of every person’s time, every day, went into building with AI. By Demo Day 5 on April 30th, we had shipped 52 internal apps, deployed multiple production AI agents, redesigned core processes, and turned a partnership of investors and operators into a partnership of &lt;em&gt;builders&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
